Appendix Materials for "Development and Evaluation of Search Tasks for IIR Experiments using a Cognitive Complexity Framework"

In recent years, the “search as learning” community has argued that search systems should be designed to support learning. We report on a lab study in which we manipulated the learning objectives associated with search tasks assigned to participants. We manipulated learning objectives by leveraging Anderson and Krathwohl’s taxonomy of learning (A&K’s taxonomy) [2], which situates learn-ing objectives at the intersection of two orthogonal dimensions: the cognitive process and the knowledge type dimension. Participants in our study completed tasks with learning objectives that varied across three cognitive processes (apply, evaluate, and create) and three knowledge types (factual, conceptual, and procedural knowledge). We focus on the effects of the task’s cognitive process and knowledge type on participants’ pre-/post-task perceptions and search behaviors. Our results found that the three knowledge types considered in our study had a greater effect than the three cognitive processes. Specifically, conceptual knowledge tasks were perceived to be more difficult and required more search activity. We discuss implications for designing search systems that support learning

Investigating the Influence of Subgoals on Learning During Search

Search-as-learning research has emphasized the need to better support searchers when learning about complex topics online. Prior work in the learning sciences has shown that effective self-regulated learning (SRL), in which goals are a central function, is critical to improving learning outcomes. This dissertation investigates the influence of subgoals on learning during search. Two conditions were investigated: Subgoals and NoSubgoals. In the Subgoals condition, a tool called the Subgoal Manager was used to help searchers to develop specific subgoals associated with an overall learning-oriented search task. The influence of subgoals is explored along four dimensions: (1) learning outcomes; (2) searcher perceptions; (3) search behaviors; and (4) SRL processes. Learning outcomes were measured with two assessments, an established multiple-choice conceptual knowledge test and an open-ended summary of learning. Learning assessments were administered immediately after search and one week after search to capture learning retention. A qualitative analysis was conducted to identify the percentage of true statements on open-ended learning assessments. A think-aloud protocol was used to capture SRL processes. A second qualitative analysis was conducted to categorize SRL processes from think-aloud comments and behaviors during the search session. Findings from the dissertation suggest that subgoals improved learning during search. Additionally, it seems that subgoals helped participants to better retain what was learned one week later. Findings also suggest that SRL processes of participants in the Subgoals condition were more frequent and more diverse. SRL processes that were explicitly supported by the Subgoal Manager seemed to be more frequent in the Subgoals condition as well as SRL processes that were not explicitly supported.Doctor of Philosoph